- 2 -
                                       
         QUESTIONS PRESENTED
              
         1.  THE PETITIONERS ARE SEEKING RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT FROM 

         U. S. DISTRICT COURT UNDER FRCP RULE 60 (B).

         2.  WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT MADE A MISTAKE IN FAILING TO

         ALLOW THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS PURSUANT

         TO RULE 12 (A) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.

         TOWN OF SHARON DID NOT ANSWER THE COMPLAINT.

         3. DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR AS A MATTER OF LAW IN FAILING

         TO ALLOW THE MOTION ON DEFAULT PURSUANT TO RULE 12 (A) OF FRCP.

         DONALD WILLIAMS FILED LATE IN AN UNTIMELY MANNER.

         4.  WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT FAILED TO APPLY THE PROPER

         STANDARD IN DETERMINING THE MOTION FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT

         AGAINST JOSEPH BERNSTEIN FOR DESTROYING EVIDENCE.

         5.  DID THE DISTRICT COURT MAKE A MISTAKE IN FACT AT THE 

         SCHEDULING CONFERENCE?  MOST OF THE HEARING WAS NOT RECORDED

         BY THE COURT REPORTER.

         6.  WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN FAILING TO USE PROPER

         STANDARD WHEN SHE COERCED THE PETITIONER INTO SUPPLYING HIS

         CORRECT BIRTH DATE WHEN IT WAS LISTED INCORRECTLY BY DEFENSE

         ATTORNEY SUSAN E. BERNSTEIN ON THE ORDER FOR MEDICAL RECORDS.
    
         7.  DISTRICT COURT MADE AN ERROR OF LAW AND FACT BY FAILING TO

         APPLY UNIFORM STANDARD BY NOT ACCEPTING THE PETITIONER'S 

         COMPLAINT AS SUBMITTED.

         8.  DID THE DISTRICT COURT ABUSE IT'S DISCRETION IN FAILING

         TO ALLOW THE PETITIONER A COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEY.